According
to a recent statement by Safar Mekhtiyev, deputy chairman of the State
Customs Committee, at a sitting of the permanent parliamentary commission
for economic policy, the leadership of the State Customs Committee
of Azerbaijan has appealed to the Cabinet of Ministers to reconsider
several articles in the production sharing agreement on the development
of the Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli offshore fields.
Mekhtiyev said that based on the current legislation, all import and
export transactions carried out under the "contract of the century"
were exempt from customs and value added tax (VAT). "However,
in order for Azerbaijan to approach the World Trade Organization,
we must finally resolve the problem of such privileges for individual
companies as demanded by the international financial organizations,"
explained Mekhtiyev.

The office of the Custom Committee of Azerbaijan
He also said that the corresponding articles providing for production
sharing might be reconsidered upon completion of the capital construction
works within the projects: "Privileges exempting the operating
companies from custom dues may be eliminated in the future."
Concerning this proposal from a representative of the State Customs
Committee, sources in AIOC developing the Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli field
noted that the contract was signed on September 20, 1994, and approved
by the Parliament on November 15 of the same year. The contract was
validated by presidential decree on December 12, 1994. The term of
the production sharing agreement expires in 2024 but may be prolonged
for another 5 years with the consent of the State Oil Company of Azerbaijan.
AIOC representatives explained, "This contract should be considered
as law with priority over any other laws in Azerbaijan which were
adopted afterwards."
However, the "contract of the century" may indeed be changed.
This is a very complicate issue, because all 11 participants must
give their consent to any proposed changes. Sources in SOCAR in turn
state that they "understand the intentions of the State Customs
Committee, which could increase custom charges and transfers to the
state budget by annulling certain privileges in the production sharing
agreement." However, SOCAR explains that this is just how it
looks at first glance, because if the State Customs Committee's proposals
were accepted, the overall value of the contract would increase automatically
and Azerbaijan would lose some of its oil profit. Besides, when Azerbaijan
signed the contract, these privileges were offered to foreign participants
in the project to "attract investment" by sweetening the
deal. SOCAR representatives' state, "We must consider the following
important issue: Azerbaijan has managed to attract huge foreign investment
over the past 10 years, but the investors have not yet been fully
compensated for their risks."
The leadership of Kazakhstan expressed its desire to introduce
certain corrections to the production sharing agreements, because
foreign petroleum companies became accustomed to "the lack
of experience of the newly established states" in the early
1990s and managed to dictate their conditions. As a result, their
rate of return was higher than in any developed country. However,
the government failed to correct the existing contracts due to strong
resistance from both the foreign companies and international institutes.
Despite this, the Government of Kazakhstan managed to strengthen
its positions in other directions. The law prohibits the employment
of foreign labor forces in the territory of Kazakhstan without clear
reason; the state company Kazmunaygaz will keep at least 50% of
all production sharing agreement and reserve the right to operate,
while contractor and subcontractor works will be assigned to foreign
companies only if no local companies can handle the project. Some
foreign companies could not stand this governmental pressure and
decided to sell their shares to other companies, abandon the market,
and pull out. The Government of Kazakhstan, which already had monetary
reserves of over $15 billion, managed to prove that it had priorities
as the field owner and purchased nearly all shares in these projects.
Unlike the Government of Kazakhstan, the leadership of Azerbaijan
is trying the opposing strategy of pleasing its outside partners.
Despite its significant experience in oil and gas production, the
State Oil Company does not directly run any joint projects with
foreign companies under management contracts. Even in onshore projects,
which do not demand serious investment or experience, SOCAR is satisfied
with a mere 20% share. After 11 years of experience with Western
technology and management, there is not a single citizen of Azerbaijan
as vice president or managing director in the "Contract of
the Century". The State Oil Company of Azerbaijan is systematically
divesting itself of its producing associations and transforming
into a socialistic bureaucratic machine that put profit first, which
is unable to operate the market mechanisms and must always wait
for certain signals from the government. Maybe this is why there
is not a single private local production company in Azerbaijan's
oil and gas market.
|